Download!Download Point responsive WP Theme for FREE!

VIDEO: Do Meat Promote Toxic Masculinity?

How the Meat Industry Exploits Toxic Masculinity

The way we view food is dangerously gendered.

If you heard a flippant joke or two the day the World Health Organization announced that some processed meats are as cancerous as cigarettes, you’re not alone. While it is not all that surprising to learn that fatty and processed food is linked to unsettling health outcomes, the warning received an inordinate amount of pushback—and not only from predictable sources like the National Pork Producers Council, which boasts $24 billion in sales from pork production. The news seemed to hit a nerve across America, a country that continues to hold a top-tier rank for the most meat consumption per capita.

Among the “best Twitter reactions” to the news were deflective quips like, “Bacon causes cancer? Well I’m going to try to eat it all so no one else has to suffer. Not all heroes wear capes,” and, “Devastating that scientists say bacon causes cancer and we face the fact that we’ll have to give up science.”

Well, it depends on how you see it. Science doesn’t have a biased agenda, it shows what is, (kind of like 1+1 equating to 2 and every human being including nature responding to that fact). However, the person or organization presenting the science can be biased based on their agenda (regarding the argument of vaccinations and scientific “evidence” from both sides showing the results supporting their beliefs or hypothesis). So, does it really depend on how you see the science of meat?

Embedded into our very cultural fabric is a connection between meat and the stereotypical masculine realms of American life: sports, weight lifting, bar culture, cars, running a family. Imagine the Super Bowl without buffalo wings, or watching March Madness over salads instead of burgers and beer.

From our observation this do seem true. Meat is crucial during the marketing season around sports.

Is it any wonder, then, that a study in the Journal of Consumer Research has found that American men consume more meat than women? Or, conversely, that it’s women who make up the majority of vegan and vegetarian populations?

Which raises the question: Why are men linked to meat-eating? Is it the result of dudes just liking meat more—a relic of our hunter-gatherer past? Or could there be something more nefarious at play?

Violence In Many Forms

Let’s talk about toxic masculinity.

This concept, defined as the “socially-constructed attitudes that describe the masculine gender role as violent, unemotional, sexually aggressive, and so forth,” is one of the many ways the patriarchy hurts not just women, but men. And it could be hurting them when it comes to what they eat, as well.

In our culture, men are shown that they are valued if they are comfortable with and able to participate in violence and stand up for themselves in a physical way. Being “a man” in the traditional sense means distancing oneself from compassion and empathy, and these rough and tough characteristics in turn foster more violent actions against others.

A media analysis conducted by Children Now, a nonpartisan organization, found that most portrayals of men on television and in film show them ridiculing others, behaving aggressively, and solving conflict through sex. Data released by the FBI reveals that men are more likely to commit a crime, and that they make up the bulk of gun owners. Men are also disproportionately enrolled in the military and the police force.

Moreover, men are told that they should be sexually dominant toward women, pursuing them in a sport-like manner. These sexual and behavioral dynamics are at the root of rape culture in America, where one in five women report having been sexually assaulted with approximately 98% of rapes against women perpetrated by a man.

I have to point out that this sounds like rape is connected to eating meat and the media influence in men. For example; regardless if there’s a “statistic” or not, I doubt they asked each “rapist” if he ate meat all his life before choosing to rape that female victim. Why not ask the men in prison who’ve possibly raped their male cellmates the same question?

Was it possible that there may have been deeper situations in that rapist’s mind beyond being “influenced” by media to take that piece of ass (no pun intended) because it’s “manly” to do so?

By the way, have a burger while you’re at it…

Possibly child abuse, molestation, or even a misunderstanding of his own sexuality? I seriously doubt meat (and the media culture) is the main culprit of him not being able to control his sexual urges, thus make him commit these crimes. If that’s the case, mind as well ban men watching the media and eating meat. Rape culture solved.

Or at least that’s how I’m perceiving that paragraph.

It’s not just the bodies of other people that men are told to oppress and domineer; animals, too, are seen as theirs to dispassionately dominate. Ninety-one percent of hunters are male—and of course, it’s men who are told that eating meat, even to their health detriment, is the manly thing to do.

Now my curiosity is how natives ate thousands of years ago. Were they told to dominate women and animals during those ancient days because the great spirits told them AFTER eating that deer or water buffalo? Could it be that these natives had more respect and a need to protect their women and tribe while consuming meat? (which by the way came directly from nature).

My curiosity is, if human were never meant to eat meat, then I must not be human. I do have a craving for red meat every once in awhile, however, my canines give me a better advantage of eating meat. And if it wasn’t, oh nature…what a tease.

I spoke with Claudia Lifton, regional director for the Factory Farm Awareness Coalition, about the reactions in the high school and college classrooms she visits to educate students about the factory farm industry. “Men are usually the ones to make bacon and protein jokes. There are usually about two or three in every class,” she said.

I remember those days. Protein jokes were usually “fart” jokes, but boys will be boys.

While these kneejerk reactions to questioning a meat-centered diet often incite laughter, Claudia does not see the humor:

“Apathy isn’t funny. Disregarding the suffering of living, feeling beings, or worse yet, laughing and joking about that suffering is not funny. It’s not cool. This is not an ethical side issue. This is [billions of] sentient beings suffering so horrifically that most of the people making those jokes can’t even bear to watch a three-minute video of it. It’s difficult for them to grasp the magnitude of damage caused by a comment like ‘mmm looks delicious’ after seeing the conditions in which these animals live and die.”

Then don’t laugh, but don’t stop them from wanting to. I know I sound harsh here, however I don’t allow anyone to shape or influence my feelings towards anything on a topic they have no personal experience or proof of. Now with that being said, I’m a huge advocate of animal welfare and their treatment.

I put my money where my mouth is–literally.

Animals should be treated with extreme care and healthy nourishment. All I know that personally, I know the difference between an animal who went through extreme stress and pain before slaughter and one who was treated with dignity and care; by the way they taste.

These defensive reactions, and the argument to keep meat in our food pyramid, goes beyond the omnivorous hunter-gatherer explanation. Corporate and cultural influence is clear in America’s popularized dietary choices. Menus vary greatly across countries and religions all over the world, in particular regions like Southeast Asia, where the traditional palate does not include nearly as much meat as in America. Many religious philosophies even teach vegetarianism, unlike the dominion-over-animals view embedded in the United States through a long Christian heritage that devalues non-human lives.

Based on our research regarding the food industry, corporate influence has had a huge impact on the formation of the food pyramid including the “heart healthy diet”.

Our view of food has been shaped and gendered by a booming dieting industry that tells women to abide by a restrictive, low-calorie lifestyle and a factory farm industry that makes billions of dollars insisting that men are the strongest when they have the most muscle, the least amount of feelings, and ingest the most “manly” protein, like bacon, steak, and sausage. One study even found that vegan and vegetarian men are seen as less sexually appealing among some women, as they deviate from the traditional behaviors of men in society.

These attitudes, as the WHO report helped to reveal, can actively hurt men by keeping them tied to a food with serious health consequences. While protein is a critical nutrient in our diet, consuming an excess of it can cause liver damage and other long-term health consequences. The idealized masculine diet not only includes meat-eating, but also looks down on consuming fruit and vegetables—because apparently real American men do not worry about their immune system or fiber intake. And that’s to say nothing of the the drastic way eating meat exacerbates climate change; in fact, a recent study found that by 2050, eight million fewer people would die each year if the world went vegan.

Again, it’s how YOU look at it.

Each time we affirm the standards of masculinity built from harming or marginalizing others, we lower our expectations for men to live a fully realized and compassionate life.

Hopefully, though, our perceptions of meat-eating and masculinity are not as static as they appear. The choice of what to eat is one of the privileges of living in an affluent country. A recent commercial from PETA attempts to combat the myth of male vegans being less masculine by dramatizing a recent finding that vegans are more sexually potent than meat-eaters. While the commercial did not make it to the Super Bowl, it’s hard not to wonder what the reaction would have been by football fans if it was aired. It certainly would have been unexpected for some.

But not all.

Changing The Conversation

David Carter, a NFL defensive lineman on the Chicago Bears who is known as the 300 Pound Vegan and is the Motivational Speaker & Diversity Specialist for Vegan Outreach, shared with me his views on the myth that eating meat is masculine:

“Before going vegan I was concerned, like most men, that being vegan would make me weak and bring my masculinity into question. What I learned after making the switch to a plant-based lifestyle was that society’s definition of manliness couldn’t be further from what I now consider masculine. Standing up for what’s right, protecting the innocent, and taking care of your body is not only manly in my eyes, it’s basic common sense. The definition of masculinity is something that should be constantly evolving. “

Samuel L. Jackson, Mos Def, Russell Simmons, Paul McCartney, Liam Hemsworth, and other male icons have ditched meat, perhaps further reflecting a soon-to-come shift in seeing meat-eating as a masculine marker. One vegan meat company, Beyond Meat, even offers a “Beast Burger” that is packaged in colors that may appeal to men, along with a photograph of the burger sizzling on a grill. The use of the masculine word “beast” might attract meat-eating men who identify with traditional masculine norms looking to switch over. A former McDonald’s CEO recently joined Beyond Meat’s team.

If the alleged videos like this one (WARNING: Contains disturbing material. Viewer discretion is advised) is true (which we’re very convinced it is) regarding McDonald’s and their food, we can definitely understand its former CEO making the switch without hesitation.

Still, even with the increasing availability of vegetarian and vegan options, eating meat is the dominant dietary choice in the United States; only 5% of the U.S. population identifies as vegetarian.

Of course, not all meat is created equally, and the question of the “best” diet is inevitably a complicated one, with no objectively right answer. But it’s worth questioning the ways in which the processed-meat industry taps into, and perpetuates, damaging notions of toxic masculinity built around the oppression of others.

There’s a reason a recent video that shows Ted Cruz defending his stance on denying equal rights to the LGBTQ community while eating a freshly grilled burger feels so distinctly and quintessentally American. And it’s a reason that should give us all pause.

Juliana Roth is a writer from Nyack, New York whose poetry, essays, and fiction have appeared in Irish Pages, Bear River Review, DIN Magazine, and Brawler Lit. She currently works for the Center for the Education of Women in Ann Arbor, Michigan.


Toxic Hungr’s Take:

We want to thank Juliana Roth on a very good article and expressing her views on meat consumption affecting everyone across the board. Much respect for a very well educated and talented writer.

With that being said, is this saying that meat and the media is the reason why men rape women across the board?

Well guys, you have not only one alibi, but TWO OF THEM; Meat and media!

If that’s the case, we’re calling foul.

We want to seriously emphasize that rape is a serious heinous crime, and no matter who influenced who regarding what he or she ate, there’s absolutely NO excuse of someone raping another person period. Unless the rapist is a complete robot, he/she is responsible for the action they perpetrated and nothing is an excuse for their crime. That includes the so-call meat and media culture.

With that being said, we want to reinforce our belief that what you put in your body can reflect how your body react to it. In other words, justifying the cliché; you are what you eat.

The meat industry is one of the most scrutinize food related industries in the world, especially in America. Due to the rise of convenient fast foods restaurants and the “grab your food and go” culture, the demand for meat increased drastically, thus had companies involved in the meat processing industry to process meat–well–faster. Even if certain techniques and practices caused the horrific torturous experience of that animal which lowered their ell being, which caused these “animal concentration camps” to churn out more processed meat faster and faster to meet the demand of the free market.

We also believe that regardless of how industries treated these animals, there’s a reason for that. There was a demand for faster and quicker meat. So because that customer wanted it quick and in a hurry, they’re not tasting the meat, they’re chomping and going.

Can you imagine that?

This could possible be why most PEOPLE experience aggressiveness. Not an opinion, this was a scientific research based on how the brain reacts to chemicals that’s foreign to what the body would recognize which cause the brain to react according to what that guy (or girl) is expected to react.

In other words; they’re consuming more of chemicals apart from meat, and those chemicals are running through their blood stream while being consumed with media and marketing telling them what to do.

Now you’ve probably assume I’m a meat-eating carnivore writing this. I do eat meat, however, I do agree with what this article saying at an extent. I do not agree with eating “just” vegetable. Based on my body, the best meat that I converted to in the past couple of years is organic free ranged grass-fed beef and bison. I definitely felt—AND TASTED—the difference.

If you prefer to eat meat, but do not support animal abuse, I highly recommend organic locally raised meats. It digest the way it supposed to because it is real, natural, and bio-degradable. What I mean by that is my body recognize the real nature of the organic meat, therefore, respond to the real organic vegetation that animal consumed prior to death. No chemicals, addictive, antibiotics, or being confined to closed quarters. You can taste the “game” flavor in the meat, and it taste cleaner than your typical “aggressive” meat sold at the local fast food joint and grocery store.

There IS scientific proof linking aggressive behavior to the meat you consume. You are literally what you eat—which means, everything that animal went through, from birth to processing, everything it seen, felt, and experienced—you’re eating and tasting—IF you could taste anything at all.

I know I mention “haven’t seen proof or experienced it”, however, my body didn’t lie to me after noticing the difference between eating processed meat, and switching to organic. And that is from personal experience with my body alone. 😉

What’s your thoughts on this? Start the convo below!

The Fat Diminisher

Share your thoughts below...