Mother facing jail time for not vaccinating son
A Michigan mother has a choice to make: either go against her beliefs and vaccinate her son, or go to jail.
Rebecca Bredow, of the Metro Detroit area, has one week to get her 9-year-old son vaccinated or an Oakland County judge will throw her in jail.
“I would rather sit behind bars standing up for what I believe in, than giving in to something I strongly don’t believe in,” she told WXYZ. “God forbid he were to be injured by one of the vaccines, then what. That scares me.”
Bredow, a mother of two, told the outlet that when her son was born she and her ex-husband decided to space out and delay some of his vaccines.
However, now that the child is older the boy’s father wants the vaccines done. Bredow, who educated herself and researched the effects vaccines have on children, is against it.*
“It wasn’t until they started grouping them together that I backed off of doing vaccines,” she explained.
After reading up on vaccinations, Bredow said she decided the best option would be a waiver, which in the state of Michigan allows parents to opt out of getting their kids certain vaccinations.
Her decision has landed her in a court battle with her ex-husband, where a judge sided with the father, who wants the vaccines given to his son.
“I believe in the choice of the parent to make the right decision based on their knowledge of vaccines,” Bredow said.
She has until Oct. 11 to have the vaccinations completed. If she does not follow the judge’s order, she could go to jail for contempt for violating the court’s ruling. WXYZ reports that the court would decide how long Bredow would sit behind bars, if it comes to that.
“I feel angry. I feel backed into a corner. I feel my rights as a parent have been taken away,” she said.
“Yes, every parent has a choice but we also have a right to have our voices heard. So why automatically side with the father that wants the vaccines,” Bredow continued. “What about my choice as the mother who’s the primary caretaker, who solely takes care of my son.”¹
Bredow said she does not want to go to jail, and will continuing fighting it out in court.
Article source: New York Daily News
*Somehow RE-searching and EDUCATING yourself on proven scientific data on the side affects of certain man-made lab-tested chemicals and making an INFORMED decision to avoid these side affects threatens the multi-BILLION dollar pharmaceutical industry, as well as the drug dealers “AKA” doctors that push it for kickbacks, on top of ill-informed fearing parents that choose to go along with the status quo to avoid “rocking the boat”.
Yes, “stand up for what you believe in” says the masses…UNTIL it makes them uncomfortable on the reality that in the information age, THEY MUST educate themselves instead of relying on the antique advise of drug lords dressed in suit and ties, media propaganda without following the money on who’s funding the message behind vaccinations, and drug dealers dressed in smocks that our grandparents used to look up to like they were gods with the keys of health. And THEN having the courage to stand up for what they KNOW.
¹”…So why automatically side with the father that wants the vaccines“.
Good question: because the father is siding with the very industry that has the judge in its back pockets, that’s why. The judge’s job is to create MORE customers under the disguise of the law, when the law specifically make it ILLEGAL for anyone to put anything in your body without your consent which is protected under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution – INCLUDING all municipal, state and federal. So if society claims that you the parent is legally responsible for the basic welfare, well-being, and care of your child, it sounds like this mother deserve a medal for going above and beyond basic policy to protect her child.
However we do live in a consensual society, not a legal one based on citizen choice. So one parent’s consent is more profitable than this mother’s decision of saying no and refusing to comply. It’s profitable to have parents who are more entertained than being able to read between the lines and are illiterate to read the law. Who the heck do you think you are saying no to a multinational, multi billion-dollar industry who bought your government a long time ago, and who’s job is to create more customers regardless of side affects?
In the father’s defense, he may not be aware of the consequences of being ill-informed of these chemical concoctions and is led solely by emotions. As a father, I can imagine he feels he’s doing what he believe is best for his child also, and doesn’t mean any harm in anyway, and there’s simply a misunderstand and disagreement possibly based on the data HE researched on which could be contradicting both findings. He could be keeping influences around him that solely believe in vaccines as well, who could have been questioning his sanity the whole time and worst – manhood. At that point I recommend them both going by their gut feeling. We could speculate all day, but overstand this; the chemicals WILL, I said WILL, compromise the sensitive immune system that God put in that child’s body which is designed to –WITH PROPER MINERALS AND NUTRIENTS from a natural diet – protect that child from the elements that MAN put on the planet. Either that, or call this woman crazy and therefore agree that during that baby’s creation God made a huge mistake building the immune system in the first place.
I’m siding with the mother here. I myself was not vaccinated, and I’m the healthiest child in my family besides my younger sibling. Outside of a minor flu in my teens, I stayed hydrated with vitamins and antioxidants FROM NATURE, and knocked that son-of-a-gun clean out of the water. I won’t say my name or where I’m from because there are those with no life will research me and call the health police on me for being too healthy.
With all that being said, yes you do have a choice. Unfortunately, there’s more to the “policy” story than this. The world does not work the way you think, or been told it works. We live in a consensual society. This means everything that happens to you (and your family) is done by your CONSENT ONLY. That means you sign into contracts with your signature, verbally agree to UNDERstand THEIR rules. As a matter of fact, when you have your child in a hospital, you’ve automatically consented to certain rules and POLICIES -not laws, not known to 99 percent of people in this country, let along the world.
I hate to predict bad news, but unless this woman study the difference between what’s LEGAL under the Constitution, and CONSENSUAL under corporate policy (big pharma, justice system, etc), she, and YOU will always feel like you have no choice. And under CONSENT, she will SERVE (service) TIME (time=money) in jail. And yes, best KNOW that the judge will do everything in their power to make sure they pay the piper who put them on that bench. In the meantime, I suggest this woman learn how to no longer comply and OVERstand the policies and rules that THE INDUSTRY is governed under.
Regardless of my or your thoughts, beliefs, or knowing on vaccines, that child is not mine or yours, it’s hers. I suggest doing your own research to arm yourself with the knowledge to determine if vaccinations is appropriate for your child. Regardless of what society says about it, you and that child has to live with the consequences, good or bad, for life.